TCC | Theraputic Children's Center
Home Button About Us Button Services Button Admissions Button Calendar Button Contact Button FAQs Button
Our mission: to help pre-school aged children build key developmental skills.
1. The Cyzner Institute Individual Instruction (A)
2. The Cyzner Institute Individual Instruction (B)
3. Motor and Social Skills Group



Case Study #1 Individual Instruction Case Study (A)

Jeffrey was a 38-month old child referred to us by a developmental specialist who had diagnosed him as having pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified. Jeffrey showed delays in most areas of development including speech and language skills, social/emotional skills, gross motor skills, fine motor skills and self-help skills.

His parents enrolled him in our tutorial program four days a week for two hours each day. To help Jeffrey learn those social and behavioral skills necessary to succeed in a small classroom, he worked one-to-one with a teacher for the first six weeks. Once he gained the skills necessary for small group work, he joined a small classroom containing one other child and a teacher.

During the first several months of instruction, Jeffrey worked closely with his teacher on developing these specific skills:

Gross Motor Skills
  • balancing
  • grasping and releasing objects
  • building upper body strength and endurance
  • learning to use both hands to complete a task
  • developing basic recreation skills
  • developing a sense of rhythm and timing
Fine Motor Skills
  • developing in-hand manipulation skills, such as rolling clay into a ball
  • or turning pages in a book
  • developing ability to color
  • developing ability to cut with scissors
  • developing basic drawing skills
Behavioral and Social Skills
  • complying with the teacher when she gave him directions
  • using gestures or words to express his needs and wants instead of having tantrums
  • waiting his turn for a toy
  • playing beside the other student (parallel play)
  • interacting with the other student during supervised activities (interactive play)
Self-Help Skills
  • feeding himself finger foods
  • drinking through a straw
  • drinking by himself from a small cup
  • telling the teacher when he needed to use the potty
  • removing then putting back on his shoes
Jeffrey made steady progress as he continued his instruction. He developed better strength and coordination, learned to create shapes with play dough, color large shapes, and cut in a relatively straight line, share toys, understand what others said to him and speak. As Jeffrey gained more skill, he gained more understanding of his environment and the people in it. He became more focused, attentive to others and seemed to take pleasure from social interactions, something he tended to avoid before we met him. Instead of picking up toys and banging them, he learned to play with them in ways for which they were intended. Overall, Jeffrey seemed happier. He spent less time crying and acting agitated and more time smiling and giggling.

« Back to top



Case Study #2 Individual Instruction Case Study (B)

Tommy was a five-year-old whose parents pulled him out of pre-school because he had difficulty participating in school activities. He was spending much of the day wandering around the classroom, interacting little with his classmates and often getting into skirmishes with them over toys. He tended not to listen to the teacher and did not stay with any one activity for more than a few seconds or so. When Tommy was evaluated at a local clinic, the therapists found him to have an auditory processing disorder, which contributed to his speech and language delays and problems with fine motor development. Tommy could not easily button and zip his clothes, feed himself with a fork and spoon or grasp a crayon or pencil. His gross motor skills appeared well-developed.

Tommy's parents enrolled him at The Cyzner Institute five days a week for four hours a day, from 9:00 to 1:00. Their goal and ours was to teach him those skills necessary to function successfully in a regular kindergarten classroom the following school year. Therefore, we arranged for fairly intensive instruction with Tommy with his parents reinforcing our instructional goals at home for an additional thirty minutes a day.

Our education director wrote an instructional plan for Tommy that included work in all developmental areas:
  • gross and fine motor skills,
  • language skills,
  • communication and cognitive skills,
  • educational readiness skills,
  • self-help skills,
  • organizing the senses for use
  • social and emotional skills.
She placed a strong emphasis on those areas in which he needed the most training, receptive and expressive language skills and fine motor skills. His instructional program came complete with goals and objectives checklists for each developmental area, step-by-step practice materials and activities, charts to record Tommy's work and graphs to show his monthly progress. His parents used these same materials when they worked with Tommy at home.

Tommy joined a group with one other child who was close to him in age and ability. These were the typical activities he completed in his four-hour day with us:

9:00 to 9:10 Warm up ­ Included having a conversation around a particular theme and specific vocabulary words (e.g. Thanksgiving, winter, family) during which the teacher helped Tommy practice the language skills he was learning and interact successfully with another child and adult.

9:10 to 9:30 Fine motor activities ­ Included creating shapes with playdough, manipulating small objects in the palm of his hand, cutting with scissors, coloring simple shapes, putting pegs in a pegboard, lacing shoelaces through lacing boards and drawing simple shapes on the easel and chalkboard.

9:30 to 9:55 Language training (one-on-one with the teacher) ­ Included both receptive and expressive language activities.

9:55 to 10:00 Short break ­ Included playing on swings, trampoline and slide (sensory support activities and gross motor skills).

10:00 to 10:30 Art activity ­ Consisted of structured independent work to further strengthen fine motor skills while teacher worked one-on-one with the other child.

10:30 to 11:00 Beginning math concepts ­ Included numerous hands-on activities, which further supported Tommy's fine motor development in addition to quantitative understanding.

11:00 to 11:30 Gross motor skills ­ Included activities to continue strengthening his muscle tone and coordination (which was already well-developed), interactive ball games (which required him to listen, follow directions and speak), walking on low-lying balance beams and completing other balance and sensory support activities, such as swinging, turning somersaults and spinning.

11:30 to 11:55 Beginning reading skills and more language training (one-on-one with the teacher)

11:55 to 12:25 Lunch ­ Included informal social, language and self-help skills training.

12:25 to 12:45 Beginning handwriting skills (one-on-one with the teacher)

12:45 to 12:55 Interactive gross motor activity ­ Included such activities as balloon toss, playing toss and catch while on the swing and running an obstacle course.

12:55 to 1:00 Preparing to go home


Over the next eight months, Tommy's teacher, his parents and the The Cyzner Institute education director communicated each week about Tommy's lessons and progress. They charted his work and reviewed and graphed his progress so the teaching team could determine how well Tommy responded to the program overall and specific teaching strategies. They made instructional adjustments as needed.

As a result of the concentrated instruction and the close coordination between Tommy's teacher and his parents, Tommy made excellent progress in all areas, particularly in his language abilities. Before the next school year began, his teacher at The Cyzner Institute met with his new kindergarten teacher to discuss Tommy's progress and those skills in which he needed additional practice and support. Tommy had a successful kindergarten experience that next year.

« Back to top



Case Study #3 Motor and Social Skills Group Case Study

Five children between the ages of three and four were referred to us for our Motor and Social Skills Group, which met on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 1:30-3:00. These children had delays in social, gross and fine motor skills, which affected their ability to initiate play, engage in shared interactions with peers and manipulate small objects like pencils, crayons and scissors.

Many of these children saw therapists who worked with them, one-to-one, to build these skills. However, they did not have an opportunity to practice their skills in small groups with their peers. Some children had tried other organized gym programs but quickly got discouraged because they could not successfully participate in the activities. Others were enrolled in regular pre-schools; however, they couldn't fully benefit from the social interactions they had. These interactions demanded more than they could give at that point in time. To help these children develop the social, gross and fine motor skills necessary to successfully participate in group activities, their parents enrolled them in our Motor and Social Skills Group.

A typical group session included these activities:
  • Circle time during which the teacher welcomed the children, prepared them for the group session and had them work on the social skill of introducing oneself, looking directly at others and telling one's name.
  • Gross motor activity when children worked on skills related to balance, upper body strength, endurance, and playground and sports skills. During this time, they also worked on turn taking and following multi-step directions appropriate for their age. Those waiting their turns often participated in fine motor activities set up on the periphery of the gross motor area.
  • Snack, bathroom and break time when children practiced interacting further with their peers.
  • Social skills activity during which children practiced sharing information about themselves, taking turns, sharing toys and playing interactive games.
  • Wrap up time when children practiced saying good-bye to their friends, and when the teacher briefly reviewed the day's session with their parents.
During the course of the three-month sessions, all the children gained new social and motor skills. Their teachers observed more appropriate peer interaction at pre-school. Their parents observed an increased desire to go to the playground and play with other children. Their occupational therapists noted improved motor skills. The greatest increases, though, were observed in the children who smiled more and interacted with their peers with greater confidence.

« Back to top
Home   About Us   Services   Admissions   Calendar   Contact/Location   FAQs
©2003-2004 Manus Academy - The Cyzner Institute All Rights Reserved
6401 carmel road, suite 101
charlotte, nc
phone 704-542-6471
fax 704-541-2858
info@ManusAcademy.com

monday-friday
morning & afternoon sessions
saturday
for special events

instructional opportunities for older students available at:
Click here for Manus Academy »

Case Studies »